Showing posts with label employment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label employment. Show all posts

September 28, 2011

Looking for More Distractions?



Google Plus

I am fairly agnostic when it comes to social media. I have tried a good number of them and found most of them wanting in one way or another. Typically, small things that imposes a time tax which, after some good-intention'd efforts, my usage starts to drift.

Hoopla over its growth and its demise (how time flies in the social media scale), aside. I like Google Plus for its open environment instead of being a walled garden. I also like the Twitter like capabilities.

Prometheus Reconsidered on G+

Prometheus Reconsidered now has an open curated stream on G+. It is updated almost daily but features articles that are related to technology, innovation, and business.

Please join the fun: Prometheus Reconsidered on Google Plus.

September 2, 2011

A Device that Loves You


Hi! I am Still Here!!

With the accolades piling on after Steve Jobs announced his retirement from his active role as Apple's CEO, I could not help but feel that I have been reading eulogies. But, to state the obvious and to paraphrase Mark Twain, Jobs' earthly departure has been greatly exaggerated.

More platitude

Jobs is known, today, for a string of i(Stuff) after he took back the rein as head of Apple. To that point, I think the most insightful comment is AEI's observation that his success is built on a series of spectacular failures. For old timers in Silicon Valley, Jobs' original notoriety was for supposedly "being inspired/borrowed/stole" the GUI (graphic user interface) and mouse design after visiting Xerox PARC to create the original Mac. On that score, one cannot help but wonder if we would still be using command line interface today without him.

On Jobs-ness

I was watching two kids playing with an iPad recently. Predictably, I marveled at the ease in which these kids, with an average age of 3, interacted with the device. What is the magic sauce? Design is important, but there are plenty of studios with world class designers. Interface is important, but it is actually a well analyzed science with its own conferences. Technology is important, but nobody buys Apple for its CPU speed or new interface cards. All of these seem to be necessary but insufficient conditions. Then, it struck me that what makes a Steve Jobs device compelling is its laser-like narrow focus on the actual user at the risk of excluding everyone else. It does not try to play nice with your corporate IT support team. It does not like talking with your friend's Android device. It actually does not do a lot of stuff that most technology types would consider important. On the other hand, I have noticed in conversations with Apple users that it often sound a bit like a love-affair.

Maybe that is the point. Steve Jobs builds a device that loves you and expects nothing less in return.


* NY Times on Steve Jobs: http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/j/steven_p_jobs/index.html

* Steve Jobs: America's Greatest Failure http://www.aei.org/article/104051

* Jobs the innovator (not inventor): http://www.fiercetelecom.com/story/apples-jobs-should-be-remembered-product-innovator-not-inventor/2011-08-29?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal

* Working with Jobs: http://venturebeat.com/2011/08/25/michael-dhuey-apple-engineer/

August 9, 2011

Office Redefined in the Age of Cloud and Mobile Computing


Not your Daddy's WordStar

Office productivity tools have come a long way from the days of the Wang Labs (assuming you even know what that is in reference to.) MIT's Tech Review has a series of articles on what constitutes an office in today's mobile and cloud computing world. A global and flattening global nature of interaction, ubiquitous and instantanious accessibility, and how to better define and protect data are some of the oft-heard observations.

These observations also lead to some interesting questions.

Roll Up a Flattened World

In a flat and global world, while it is true that people from different corners of the world can be part of the same virtual team, it is also true that virtual team is difficult to manage. Although cloud and mobile computing have made life easier. From a business perspective, how to get a team to perform at a high productivity level remains an art.

In other words, now that people are collaborate across oceans, does mobile and cloud computing offer new opportunities to close the physical distance?

Going Off the Grid

The convergence of mobile and cloud is accidental. For the early cloud folks, the emergence of a touch based device was not expected. Similarly, mobile designers only considered tapping the vast processing and storage power of Cloud as an after-thought. As users become more comfortable using smart mobile devices as the primary "office computer", how to address the productivity needs while offline will become an issue.

Adding more processing and storage on the mobile device can only get you so far. What is not clear is what are the buseinss policy tools. For example, what data can you take offline to protect privacy and security. What if several people are working on the same document, can you take it offline and work on it?

The Rise of the Virtual Office: http://www.technologyreview.com/business/38169/page1/
Tiny, Cloud-Powered Desktops: http://www.technologyreview.com/business/38171/?nlid=nldly&nld=2011-08-04
How to Secure the Virtual Office: http://www.technologyreview.com/business/38170/page1/


June 30, 2011

Google Health and MySpace


Google Health and MySpace

One of the more underappreciated aspect of the Silicon Valley ecosystem is that it is equally good at winnowing ideas that are no longer viable as it is at creating exciting new things. Therefore, I was reminded of the fanfare surrounding the prior glories of these two endeavors.

MySpace is sold off for $35mn to an advertising firm. And, Google Health + Google PowerMeter are retiring.

It would be interesting to see what these alum networks will spawn next.

* MySpace's $35mn deal: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/myspace-sold-to-advertising-firm-for-35-million/51623
* Google Health+PowerMeter: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/update-on-google-health-and-google.html

June 10, 2011

Talent War 2011


The Siren Sound


As I have noted on the ever shifting employee networks of Silicon Valley given its "at-will" employment contract. The first public salvo came from Google who offered an across the board salary increase in 2011. There are a analyses on the latest winners and losers of the latest "Talent Wars."

Not surprisingly, Apple, Facebook, and Google are all doing well, relatively speaking. The major casualty of the current phase is Yahoo who is losing a bit of its luster lately. The interesting winner is Twitter who, despite the persistent criticism of its lack of business model, is getting a lot of people to join.


* List of winners and losers of the talent war vintage 2011: http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=1501275766337378089&postID=7523281652592663360
* A graphical analysis the current talent war: http://www.focus.com/images/view/42092/

January 13, 2011

Self-organized clusters


Not a monolithic blob of geeks

One of details about Silicon Valley is how it is self-organized into clusters of technology, not unlike the traditional service clusters in New York or London. Silicon Valley is best think of as a series of circles each anchored by a leader and these overlapping allows easy cross-pollination to create new companies.

Advantage of proximity and diverse clusters

Proximity to critical mass(es) of diverse skill set is a vital part of new idea formation. Having a deep portfolio of ecosystems within a two hour driving radius, it allows for a solid support infrastructure. If you need to file a provisional patent? If you need to set up your VoIP system? If you need to find co-founders? There are plenty of good patent agents, IT administrators, and start-up soul-mates to be found.

With the overlapping technology and industry ecosystems, as people interact with each regularly, general technology diffusion and the likelihood of finding and applying aspects of known technologies/approaches to a new arena are also much higher.

Until fairly recently, many Silicon Valley VC's have opined that part of their success is due to the fact that they never have to drive for more than two hours to source, monitor, and exit their portfolio investments.

A two edged sword

On the other hand, overlapping clusters has its problems given Silicon Valley's at-will employment.

For starter, if your idea or your execution is sub-par, it is easy for people to leave and find a comparable position. Even if your idea is good and your execution above average, sometimes people leave to join a hotter opportunity. For example Google announced in November of 2010 an across the board 10% salary increase because people, so it seemed, was decamping for Facebook. Finally, for the same infrastructural advantage of clusters, people also leave to start their own companies.

December 11, 2010

Alum networks and a detour on IP management


Saying Adieus, nicely

Employees do leave. As long it is not massive, it can be healthy and allows new talents to join the team. In Silicon Valley, if somebody is leaving to start a new company, he (usually it is a "he") is viewed in positive lights. Even when a person is heading to a competitor, beyond the standard safe-guard for legal and business protection, people usually remain in good terms. The reason being that Silicon Valley is a small and dynamic place. So, in a few more years, you could be working for the same side again.

As a matter of a fact, alums from various organizations, for example Netscape, form an informal but influence ecosystem in Silicon Valley. Having worked in the same company, there is a higher level of shared experiences, expectations, and networks. These all make working together at a different company subsequently easier.

Protecting your IP

An implication that people do not often considered with the at-will law is what to do with IP (intellectual property). If you have patents, it affords greater protection when somebody leaves. But, not everything is patentable, i.e. trade secrets, and not all patents can be easily protected.

In my experience, IP is a bigger deal in hardware because it is easier to prove infringement. Software usually competes on dimensions that are more execution related such as distribution, feature set, and bueinss model. In other words, know and protect your IP. But, also know that IP has its limitations.

Incidentally, in conversations with Silicon Valley employment attorneys, everyone was flummoxed by the law suit between HP and Oracle over Mark Hurd, who left HP as CEO and soon after joined Oracle in the late 2010. It simply does not seem to be a good use of HP's legal resources.

December 7, 2010

Employment at Silicon Valley


Do you speak legal-ese

California, where Silicon Valley is located, is an "At-will" state. At-will means that either employer or the employee can break off the employment relationship at any time with no liability. (For exact legal applications, you should consult competent legal counsel, i.e. not me.)

Keeping your team productive

The implication for employers, especially software companies, is how to retain key employees. And, this is one of the reasons some Silicon Valley companies offer free meals, games in office, and bring-your-dog day. However, most of the "unconventional" methods are not only defensive in nature; after all, it is also true that happy employees make for a productive workforce.

One thing that is not as well appreciated in the context of at-will law is that it also makes employees more loyal. Instead of contractually tied to a position, everything else being equal, you work there because you want to.

Keep paddling

The other side of the equation is that every employees has to constantly keep up, branch out, and be flexible in applying skill sets. Stagnation is not really an option. Unlike the more established traditional industries where the success of an employee can be defined in terms of how well a long job description checklist is met, job descriptions in Silicon Valley are constantly morphing. Put another way, if there is a long laundry list of what constitutes success for a position, there is a good chance that it can be performed elsewhere at lower costs.

On a day-to-day basis, it is important to keep up with your given field. This could be getting a new technical certificatiion for an engineer or refining a business process if you are an executive. It is always a good idea to keep abreast of emerging trends so that, for example, when the CEO asks how the new distributed Hadoop database will impact company's e-commerce architecture you have a decent answer.

Finally, cross-training is the norm instead of exception in Silicon Valley because ambiguity is a given. Within a discipline, say software engineering, the transaction methods, architecture, and buseinss model requirements are ever changing. This requires the engineerings team to understand the how and why as oppose to merely "doing the work". If you need to reach across functional focuses, for example in product management - usually a marketing function but has to work closely with the engineering team - the ability to converse fluently with both users and development teams is a must.

Like Schumpeter said

As Schumpeter succinctly captured in the term "creative destruction", it is unlikely that what you do today in Silicon Valley is similar to what you did a couple of years ago. As technology, business model, and ecosystems develop, the same job title often demands vastly different skill sets within a short period of time.

For example, when Google popularized the on-line advertising model in early 2000's, there was no pre-existing pool of talents who knew exactly what to do. Initially, the closest parellels were the direct mail and mail-order catalog people. Since the transaction is done on-line, a lot of web designers also got involved. Moreover, with its ability to generate detailed quantitative data on buyers behavior, people with data analysis experiences jumped into the fray. All the while, marketing communication sand pre-sales people, who were traditionally responsible for website and generating qualified sales traffic are furiously learning and hiring new skills sets to meet a new way of doing business.

Within four to five year, by the mid-2000's, the motley crew that utilizes various aspects of the skills above has become an ecosystem known as SEO/SEM (search engine optimization/marketing) with its own tradeshow and gurus.